YCJA good or bad free essay sample

If you were a young offender of a misdemeanor would it be harsh for the judge to treat them as if they were an adult? Would you think by giving them equal consequences it could make their whole future more challenging? The YCJA (youth criminal justice act) is positive legislation that must be upheld but should be amended when it comes to violent crimes. This act allows for youth offenders who are less mature to not be exposed and have a second chance for a bright future. At the same time giving them a fair, long consequence to teach them a lesson. Some suggest that by giving them a more adult like punishment it would force the young offenders into not repeating their actions again. Are they right? Do we need to make changes to this act to accommodate the opinion of these people? Some may argue that the judges are too merciful and that the young offenders and adults should be treated equally. We will write a custom essay sample on YCJA good or bad? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This is because they think the offenders aren’t getting a â€Å"Harsh† enough punishment. Thus causing them to just go back and repeat their actions, and may even be escalated to more violent crimes causing the safety of the community to decrease. They are wrong because adolescent offenders are generally more immature and most likely more peer pressured into committing crimes. They are quick to act and don’t think ahead before they say or do something that might affect them in the long run. YCJA Good †¦ and Bad? If you were a young offender of a misdemeanor would it be harsh for the judge to treat them as if they were an adult? Would you think by giving them equal consequences it could make their whole future more challenging? The YCJA (youth criminal justice act) is positive legislation that must be upheld but should be amended when it comes to violent crimes. This act allows for youth offenders who are less mature to not be exposed and have a second chance for a bright future. At the same time giving them a fair, long consequence to teach them a lesson. Some suggest that by giving them a more adult like punishment it would force the young offenders into not repeating their  actions again. Are they right? Do we need to make changes to this act to accommodate the opinion of these people? Some may argue that the judges are too merciful and that the young offenders and adults should be treated equally. This is because they think the offenders aren’t getting a â€Å"Harsh† enough punishment. Thus causing them to just go back and repeat their actions, and may even be escalated to more violent crimes causing the safety of the community to decrease. They are wrong because adolescent offenders are generally more immature and most likely more peer pressured into committing crimes. They are quick to act and don’t think ahead before they say or do something that might affect them in the long run. YCJA Good †¦ and Bad? If you were a young offender of a misdemeanor would it be harsh for the judge to treat them as if they were an adult? Would you think by giving them equal consequences it could make their whole future more challenging? The YCJA (youth criminal justice act) is positive legislation that must be upheld but should be amended when it comes to violent crimes. This act allows for youth offenders who are less mature to not be exposed and have a second chance for a bright future. At the same time giving them a fair, long consequence to teach them a lesson. Some suggest that by giving them a more adult like punishment it would force the young offenders into not repeating their actions again. Are they right? Do we need to make changes to this act to accommodate the opinion of these people? Some may argue that the judges are too merciful and that the young offenders and adults should be treated equally. This is because they think the offenders aren’t getting a â€Å"Harsh† enough punishment. Thus causing them to just go back and repeat their actions, and may even be escalated to more violent crimes causing the safety of the community to decrease. They are wrong because adolescent offenders are generally more immature and most likely more peer pressured into committing crimes. They are quick to act and don’t think ahead before they say or do something that might affect them in the long run. YCJA Good †¦ and Bad? If you were a young offender of a misdemeanor would it be harsh for the judge to treat them as if they were an adult? Would you think by giving them equal consequences it could make their whole future more challenging? The YCJA (youth criminal justice act) is positive legislation that must be upheld but should be amended when it comes to violent crimes. This act allows for youth offenders who are less mature to not be exposed and have a second chance for a bright future. At the same time giving them a fair, long consequence to teach them a lesson. Some suggest that by giving them a more adult like punishment it would force the young offenders into not repeating their actions again. Are they right? Do we need to make changes to this act to accommodate the opinion of these people? Some may argue that the judges are too merciful and that the young offenders and adults should be treated equally. This is because they think the offenders aren’t getting a â€Å"Harsh† enough punishment. Thus causing them to just go back and repeat their actions, and may even be escalated to more violent crimes causing the safety of the community to decrease. They are wrong because adolescent offenders are generally more immature and most likely more peer pressured into committing crimes. They are quick to act and don’t think ahead before they say or do something that might affect them in the long run.

buy custom Types of Rapists essay

buy custom Types of Rapists essay According to Snow (2006), rapists refer to those people who force sex upon others. Rape incidences are among the most common sex crimes across the world, and many countries are implementing strategies toward addressing the issue. It is extremely crucial to understand different types of rapists before designing and implementing various strategies. This discussion will include various types of rapists, including power-reassurance rapists, power-assertive rapists, anger retaliation rapists, and sadist rapists. Power-reassurance rapists lack the interpersonal skills and self-confidence to develop intimate relationships with women (Snow, 2006). Therefore, a power-assertive rapist looks for a possible way, such as breaking into womens bedrooms, to have sex. They are the least violent and constitute about 21 percent of rapists. A power-assertive rapist usually uses a weapon in order to ensure that the victim cooperates well (Snow, 2006). This type constitutes about 44 percent of rapists and is the most common. Anger retaliation rapists constitute a unique form of rapists because the perpetrator is out to punish his victims (Snow, 2006). The victim will injure his victims to the extent where they require hospitalization. Anger-retaliation rapists are extremely dangerous, and they constitute about 40 percent of rapists. Another form of rapists who usually injure their victims is the sadist rapists. A sadist rapist intentionally maltreats women for his own intense gratification (Snow, 2006). They may murder the victims while trying to silence them, and they constitute about 5 percent of rapists. For the four types of rapists, the offender is a male and the victim is a female. People socially perceive rapists as those individuals who lack the friendly techniques of seducing women (Snow, 2006). The criminal justice system finds it had to detect and capture most rapists because victims fail to report their perpetrators upon threats. Of all rapists, the sadist rapists are the most dangerous because they usually murder their victims in the process of silencing them (Snow, 2006). Buy custom Types of Rapists essay